My Friend Is You by Kate Nash free essay sample

After purchasing the new Kate Nash album, ‘My Best Friend is You’, I hurried with glee to listen. I hoped that the fascinating and captivating songs that I had grown to love from her first album were just a taster of what was to come, and I was not disappointed. Her story like songs, filled with imagination and a conversational like tone is like listening to an old friend. Her descriptive retelling of everything that goes through her mind makes the listener feel so engaged and involved you feel as if she were in the room with you. The first half of the album is definitely the more new and original compared to the second half which resorts to the shouting and repetition of her earlier work. Controversial track ‘Mansion Song’ does give the album a darkened edge; I must admit that I felt a little uncomfortable listening to it. However, it does carry with it a strong message, along with many of her other songs. We will write a custom essay sample on My Friend Is You by Kate Nash or any similar topic specifically for you Do Not WasteYour Time HIRE WRITER Only 13.90 / page Many hits will be made from this, only Nash’s second work of art, including the hypnotic ‘Paris’ and ‘Kiss that Grrrl’. This is undoubtedly an album not to be missed, and I have a feeling Kate will continue to be my best friend for a very long time.

Free Essays on Holy Sonnet

Describe and Compare the Theme of â€Å"Death† as Explained in â€Å"Death Be Not Proud† by John Donne and â€Å"Sonnet 71† by William Shakespeare The two poems provide a complete contrast as regard to â€Å"Death†. Death Be Not Proud† is written by a Christian Minister (John Donne) and is therefore based on a religious theme, inclusive of the idea of an after life. The second poem however is written by William Shakespeare and is a secular poem, and deals with â€Å"Death† as a physical reality, which is unavoidable. Shakespeare writes more negatively and makes â€Å"Death† powerful, whereas â€Å"Death Be Not Proud† gives more hope and is written as if Death is a person, to make â€Å"Death† less powerful and mortal. Through the entire poem, Donne speaks directly to Death. He personifies what to Man, has always been a spirit and has never been touched, seen or furthermore killed. He gives Death life (a person) and therefore makes it mortal, exposing it to pain, torment and eventually defeat. In the first four lines of the poem, John Donne aggressively and directly addresses Death, his tone critical and belittling. He begins by saying, â€Å"Death be not proud†¦ for thou art not soe;† This openly challenges Death’s authority and power. By referring to Death as a person, he makes it easier for the reader to bring Death down to a level of weakness and venerability, making death seem powerless. Humans have always been like slaves to Death, running from it, and trying to prevent it. People have always tried to lead good lives in order to go to Heaven instead of Hell. They try to lead good lives so that GOD lets them stay on this great earth for a while longer. In line 9, â€Å"Thou art slave to Fate, Chance, kings, and desperate men†. The narrator goes against us being slaves to death and says that Death is a slave to fate, chance and us. Without fate nothing could be determined, therefore, our fate is truthfully w... Free Essays on Holy Sonnet Free Essays on Holy Sonnet Describe and Compare the Theme of â€Å"Death† as Explained in â€Å"Death Be Not Proud† by John Donne and â€Å"Sonnet 71† by William Shakespeare The two poems provide a complete contrast as regard to â€Å"Death†. Death Be Not Proud† is written by a Christian Minister (John Donne) and is therefore based on a religious theme, inclusive of the idea of an after life. The second poem however is written by William Shakespeare and is a secular poem, and deals with â€Å"Death† as a physical reality, which is unavoidable. Shakespeare writes more negatively and makes â€Å"Death† powerful, whereas â€Å"Death Be Not Proud† gives more hope and is written as if Death is a person, to make â€Å"Death† less powerful and mortal. Through the entire poem, Donne speaks directly to Death. He personifies what to Man, has always been a spirit and has never been touched, seen or furthermore killed. He gives Death life (a person) and therefore makes it mortal, exposing it to pain, torment and eventually defeat. In the first four lines of the poem, John Donne aggressively and directly addresses Death, his tone critical and belittling. He begins by saying, â€Å"Death be not proud†¦ for thou art not soe;† This openly challenges Death’s authority and power. By referring to Death as a person, he makes it easier for the reader to bring Death down to a level of weakness and venerability, making death seem powerless. Humans have always been like slaves to Death, running from it, and trying to prevent it. People have always tried to lead good lives in order to go to Heaven instead of Hell. They try to lead good lives so that GOD lets them stay on this great earth for a while longer. In line 9, â€Å"Thou art slave to Fate, Chance, kings, and desperate men†. The narrator goes against us being slaves to death and says that Death is a slave to fate, chance and us. Without fate nothing could be determined, therefore, our fate is truthfully w...

Mandatory drug testing for welfare recipients Research Paper

Mandatory drug testing for welfare recipients - Research Paper Example As a result, several Acts to support mandatory drug testing were introduced in order to reduce drug abuse by social welfare recipients. This paper will examine the issue of mandatory drug testing for welfare recipients and further explain why the testing policy is not effective. To start with, the social welfare programs were initiated based on the values and beliefs held by the American society. According to Segal, religious and social beliefs held by the American people championed the need for social welfare system (10). For example, popular religions in the period of 1930s included protestant Christians who believed on biblical teachings that society members should support each other. However, Segal points out that evolution of both social and religious beliefs has not been smooth and the current policies governing the social welfare represent the conflicting values and beliefs (11). For instance, introduction of mandatory drug testing to the social welfare beneficiaries is good from a social perspective because it is aimed to better the social status of the recipients. However, mandatory drug testing does not sound good on religious point of view because most religions have a view that the needy people in the society should be helped without conditions. Surprisingly, mandatory drug testing has gained popularity in several states of U.S since the introduction of Personal Responsibility and Work Opportunity Reconciliation Act (PRWORA) in 1996 that aimed to improve the intended goals of social welfare programs. Several states in the U.S saw the importance of increasing the productivity and responsibility of citizens receiving social welfare support and hence introduced the legislation of mandatory drug testing. According to the National Conference of State Legislatures (NCSL), â€Å"in 2009, over 20 states proposed legislation that would require drug testing† as a basis to determine eligibility for the benefits from social welfare programs (1).This was